To contact us Click HERE
Crawford's writing gives a first hand account of some of the war in Iraq. Considering himself an "Accidental soldier," he simply joined the national guard in order to get his tuition at college paid for. He had no idea that he would end up in Iraq, but did not question his duties when he was ordered to go there.
Crawford uses a few detailed experiences to represent the life of a soldier in Iraq. The experience of shooting the unarmed civilian was particularly shocking, especially when he nonchalantly states that he was unsure whether he realized before or after he shot him that the "enemy's" gun was broken. Probably the most interesting aspect of his writing, however, is not necessarily the text, but the style. There is a point in his writing when he simply tells an elaborate lie, something that did not really happen. Undoubtedly, this touches on the theme of what is true and not true. For the life a soldier, Crawford's writing seems to insinuate that the difference can become easily blurred.
As far as his claims of being an accidental soldier are concerned, I personally don't buy into it. Yes, he might not have predicted that he would end up in Iraq, as no one can truly predict when wars are going to break out. But, anytime someone signs up for the armed forces, they need to be aware of the potential duties and tasks that go along with that type of commitment. Just because he does not agree with his purpose in Iraq or expect to be there, it does not mean he is an accidental soldier. Instead, I would define him as an instrumental soldier, as his reasons for fighting are outside the realm of war. However, overall, I found Crawford's writing entertaining and intriguing. It was nice to read a war story that kept its reader on the edge.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder