Deerfield Beach Housing Authority (DBHA) Opens TheirSection 8 or Plan 8 Waiting List.

To contact us Click HERE

The Deerfield Beach Housing Authority (DBHA) will accept 500 preliminary Section 8 applications for the Program's Waiting List on Wednesday, March 21, 2012.

The Section 8 Wait List will only be available online at www.dbhaonline.org starting at 9:00 a.m. until 500 are submitted.

Any Section 8 submission that is not fully and accurately completed shall be void. Only one per household will be considered throughout the entire process. Anyone that submits more than ONE will be void.

NO TELEPHONE CALLS, FAXES, MAIL-INS, WALK-INS, E-MAILS, OR DROP OFF WILL BE ACCEPTED.

DBHA will only accept 500

Again, the preliminary waiting list will close once 500 applications are submitted online.

To qualify as an eligible family, the total household annual gross income must not exceed the very-low income limits, as shown below, for the household size.

Family Size:	1 Person	2 Persons	3 Persons	4 Persons
Very-Low Income	$25,100	$28,650	$32,250	$35,800

Family Size:	5 Persons	6 Persons	7 Persons	8 Persons
Very-Low Income	$38,700	$41,550	$44,400	$47,300

If you do not have computer access at home, you may go to a public library or any other place where computers are available to access this website to complete the application.

If you need reasonable accommodation for a special needs person, please contact the Center for Independent Living at 1-888-722-6400 or Deerfield Beach Housing Authority at 954-425-8449, five business days prior to the opening of the preliminary waiting list.

For the hearing impaired, please call TDD#1-800-955-8771.

Related Links, Blog Postings, Presentations or Articles:

• Deerfield Beach Housing Authority
• Procedures for Completing the Section 8 Online Preliminary Application PDF

Written by Bob Burns.

####

No Boundaries, Baby! Real Estate Investor Telephone #: 305-300-6242 email: sec8@planocho.com

Our Internet Footprint:

Obama Prepping Thousands of Lawyers For Election

To contact us Click HERE
President Barack Obama's campaign has recruited a legion of lawyers to be on standby for this year's election as legal disputes surrounding the voting process escalate.
Thousands of attorneys and support staffers have agreed to aid in the effort, providing a mass of legal support that appears to be unrivaled by Republicans or precedent. Obama's campaign says it is particularly concerned about the implementation of new voter ID laws across the country, the possibility of anti-fraud activists challenging legitimate voters and the handling of voter registrations in the most competitive states.
Republicans are building their own legal teams for the election. They say they're focused on preventing fraud - making sure people don't vote unless they're eligible - rather than turning away qualified voters.
More 

Epic Encounters: King Tut Article

To contact us Click HERE
Epic Encounters was a very enlightening article. It really showed race and political relations between America and Egypt, and White America and African Americans. The King Tut phenomena in the 70’s was more than a simple exhibit in the MET, but a catalyst for talks about middle eastern oil and ancient civilizations. On an international scale the King Tut exhibit was a sign of good relations between America and the Middle East. It showed that we valued their culture, and this opened a door for us to secure oil. On a national scale the King Tut exhibit touched on thoughts about race and white cultural supremacy. Many believed that Egypt became such a dominant civilization because of the migration of Europeans and Asians into that region. This thought was displayed in the way the exhibit was laid out and the through reviews that scholars gave about the exhibit. The African American community did not accept this thought about Egypt and its formation as a great ancient civilization. King Tut represented a role model and a connection to a culturally rich past for African Americans.
This article is really well written and showed the Western European mentality about imperialism and race. America only seemed to acknowledge certain people and cultures when it is convenient for them. Without the riches of Egypt and its accessibility to oil would America have been so inclined to improve relations with this country? If Egypt did not have had such an amazing past would white America have been so ready to put their ancestors in an African country? I think that the answer to both of these questions are, no.

A Consumer's Republic

To contact us Click HERE
I found the subject of "A Consumer's Republic" to be very interesting, as the book made many valid points that are often forgotten today.  I liked that she used many examples throughout her writing to illustrate her various points, including many from the Depression and World War II.  She shows how being a citizen in the United States of America in the post-war era has been drastically redefined by consumerism.  I also enjoyed the arguments she made and examples she gave about women and minorities during this time period, and how the effect they had on consumerism was later redeemed through Civil Rights movements of the 50s and 60s.
After reading this thought-provoking book, I feel much more educated about the United States twentieth century economic history.  Although I thought the book to be very interesting, I also found it difficult to follow at times because of the many long, winding sentences that are a part of her writing style.  I found myself having to re-read sections quite often in order to fully understand her argument.  However, I would definitely recommend this book to others, as it does a great job of depicting and analyzing consumerism.

To contact us Click HERE

June 6, 2012

Voters in California Back Pension Cuts for City Workers

By IAN LOVETT

LOS ANGELES — As Wisconsin residents voted on Tuesday not to recall Gov. Scott Walker — who has become an enemy of labor unions nationwide — two California cities dealt blows of their own to organized labor.In San Diego and San Jose, voters overwhelmingly approved ballot initiatives designed to help balance ailing municipal budgets by cutting retirement benefits for city workers.Around 70 percent of San Jose voters favored the pension measure, while 66 percent of San Diego residents supported a similar measure."This is really important to our taxpayers," Mayor Chuck Reed of San Jose, said Tuesday night. "We’ll get control over these skyrocketing retirement costs and be able to provide the services they are paying for."Statewide, voters also remained very closely divided on a $1-per-pack tax on cigarettes, which would be the first increase in the cigarette tax here in 14 years. Proceeds from the tax would not go to state coffers, but would instead finance cancer research.The tax remained too close to call on Wednesday morning, according to The Associated Press, although opponents of the measure appeared to cling to a razor-thin lead with all precincts reporting.Antismoking advocates, who promoted the tax as the best way to reduce smoking rates, were outspent nearly four to one. Their opponents, financed largely by the tobacco industry, spent almost $47 million in advertisements to defeat the measure.Public employee unions, meanwhile, had fought hard against the two pension reform initiatives.The San Diego Municipal Employees Association brought an unsuccessful legal challenge in an effort to keep the measure off the ballot.Speaking to KPBS, a local television station, Michael Zucchet, general manager of the San Diego Municipal Employees Association, said last month that the ballot initiative would not save the city money.“This initiative doesn’t save anything,” Mr. Zucchet said. “You are basically cutting off your nose to spite your face for pension reform.”Mr. Zucchet did not respond to requests for comment on Tuesday night.But the mayors of both cities pushed the pension reforms hard, arguing that changes to city worker pensions were essential to keep municipal budgets in the black.Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, said he hoped the initiatives would provide models for other cities and for the state government, where pension reform efforts have stalled. "The appetite for pension reform in California is huge," Mr. Coupal said.Tuesday also offered the first widespread test of the state’s new primary system, in which the top two vote-getters move on to a runoff, regardless of party affiliation.One of the most heavily financed races pit two sitting Democratic representatives, colleagues in the House for 15 years, against each other to represent the San Fernando Valley: Brad Sherman won with 42 percent of the vote, and Howard L. Berman had 32 percent. They will face each other again in the November runoff.

To contact us Click HERE

California primaries show Democratic divide on education

• inShare
• Share this
• Email
• Print

Related News

• California primary sees fierce contests but low turnout5:17am EDT
• Voting brisk in closely watched Wisconsin recallTue, Jun 5 2012
• California primary sets off political scrambleTue, Jun 5 2012
• Wisconsin recall vote to resonate in presidential raceSat, Jun 2 2012
• Teacher unions fight to keep clout with DemocratsFri, May 25 2012

Analysis & Opinion

• Essential reading: Greeks stop paying taxes, Nancy Pelosi’s rich tax, and more
• Oracle suit gives Google a chance not to be evil

Related Topics

• Politics »
• Barack Obama »
• Election 2012 »

By Stephanie SimonWed Jun 6, 2012 12:22pm EDT(Reuters) - Democratic candidates backed by wealthy advocates for charter schools squeaked past rivals backed by teachers unions in two California state assembly primary races on Tuesday, highlighting a bitter split in the Democratic Party over education policy.The most contentious race was in Assembly District 46, a heavily Democratic swath of Los Angeles suburbs.Wealthy philanthropists, hedge-fund managers and internet entrepreneurs - bound together by a common goal of overhauling public education - spent an eye-popping $1.4 million to bolster the candidacy of Brian Johnson, a Democrat who until recently ran a network of charter schools.Johnson narrowly edged Andrew Lachman, a Democrat supported by the California Teachers Association, to secure second place in the six-person primary and earn a chance to face voters again in the fall, according to final results from the California Secretary of State's office.Under California's new non-partisan primary system, the top two finishers advance to the November general election regardless of party affiliation.The teachers union spent nearly $500,000 on ads attacking Johnson, but he drew 20.3 percent of the vote, to Lachman's 19.3 percent. The top vote-getter was another Democrat, Adrin Nazarian, the chief of staff to a Los Angeles city councilman. Nazarian has been endorsed by several other unions and college faculty associations.A similar pattern played out in Assembly District 57, which runs along the border between Los Angeles and Orange Counties in Southern California.Democrat Ian Calderon - the son of one of the most powerful state assemblymen in the capital Sacramento - beat out fellow Democrat Rudy Bermudez by 231 votes in Tuesday's primary to advance to the general election. Bermudez, a former parole guard, was endorsed by the California Teachers Association, though the union did not spend money on the race.The top vote-getter was Republican businessman Noel Jaimes, but the district is overwhelmingly Democratic, making Calderon the favorite for November.Calderon, a 26-year-old surfing champion and newcomer to politics, has pledged to give parents unprecedented power over their public schools, including the right to fire failing administrators, direct extra pay to successful teachers and control budgets.That agenda resonates with a coalition known as "education reformers," who have been working in California and nationally to promote a more free-market approach to public education. Teachers unions bitterly object, saying there's no proof the reform agenda will improve student learning.Among the policies opposed by teachers unions: Expanding charter schools, which are publicly funded but typically run by private firms; evaluating teachers in large part by their students' scores on standardized tests; and abolishing the seniority rules that protect veteran teachers from layoffs.Teachers unions have long been among the most reliable - and most generous - allies of Democratic politicians. So the education reform community has moved aggressively to provide an alternative.Donors such as developer Eli Broad, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings and Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, have spent heavily to back Democratic politicians willing to buck the teachers unions.Michelle Rhee, the former chancellor of the Washington D.C. public schools, also emerged as a major player in the California primaries.Rhee runs an education advocacy group, StudentsFirst, which spent $370,000 to back Calderon and about $400,000 in support of Johnson. The political action committee she founded to engage in California races started out with $2 million, which would leave more than $1 million in reserve for the general election.(Reporting by Stephanie Simon in Denver; Editing by Paul Simao)

To contact us Click HERE
WEDNESDAY, JUN 6, 2012 09:42 AM EDT

Can unions bounce back?

Tom Barrett's defeat in Wisconsin was a devastating blow to labor -- but not a death knell

BY JOSH EIDELSON

 
•  6
 
•  35
 
 
• more
 

TOPICS: WISCONSIN RECALLTom Barrett concedes the race at his election night rally in Milwaukee.(Credit: Reuters/John Gress)

MADISON – Last year, Wisconsinites reinvigorated the labor movement as they defied their union-busting governor. Last night, Wisconsinites voted to keep him office. That result cements Wisconsin as the place that best captures both the vitality and the vulnerability of the current U.S. labor movement.
There’s much to mourn in last night’s result. What it reflects: the triumph of big money in politics and the traction of anti-union resentment. What it inspires: even more aggressive attacks from employers and politicians. What it cements: public workers’ legal right to bargain will be anemic in Wisconsin for years.
At an election night party in Madison, the president of a New York union local told me Walker’s victory will inspire Governor Cuomo to go even harder after his union. A Madison school nursing assistant told me it’ll drive her co-workers to leave the profession before their pensions are gutted. And people pondered why so many of their fellow citizens would side with a governor who’d promised to “divide and conquer” union members.
In Wisconsin, what long seemed stable – the political and legal support for workers’ right to negotiate with their boss – turned out, when tested, to be precarious. That’s not the only place that’s happened to unions recently. When Boeing managers bragged about retaliation for strikes, fury from Republicans, complicity from Democrats, and the rusty wheels of the National Labor Relations Board conspired to leave the workers in the lurch. As more employers have been locking out their unionized employees – denying them work until they accepted concessions – workers have found that just having a union contract isn’t enough to keep your boss at bay. Since teacher-bashing became a hot trend in “education reform,” mainstream Democrats boast about defying teachers’ unions, while reassuring them that unlike the GOP, they want them to keep existing. (When I asked Democratic Governors Association Chair Martin O’Malley, who was in Madison campaigning for Barrett, about his fellow Democratic Governor Dan Malloy’s proposal to curtail teachers bargaining rights, O’Malley said he wasn’t familiar with “the nuances of collective bargaining” in Connecticut, but that unlike Walker, Democrats “don’t wade into this with our primary goal being to crush the teacher’s union.”)
Over the past week, canvassers recounted visits to Democratic voters who said that while they didn’t support Walker, they didn’t believe a recall was necessary (of course, some national Democrats agreed with them). Some were probably just pro-Walker Democrats who were being polite; others may really have believed that none of Walker’s offenses was severe enough to disrupt the tradition of four-year terms. Either way, that reaction’s a reminder that an injury to many – the frontal assault on public workers — wasn’t seen by all as an injury to them.
But even as Wisconsin highlights labor’s vulnerability, it shows how dynamic a true labor movement can become. The recall effort itself offers one measure of what labor and its allies accomplished: triggering the third such election in U.S. history, fighting Walker to a close race despite marked asymmetry in cash (and national party support), and seizing control of the state Senate. While Walker’s survival will embolden other anti-union politicians, they’d be far bolder already if labor had just rolled over as rights were stripped away last year.
But the uprising in Wisconsin has accomplished far more than instigating an election. It’s pushed state senators to meet a higher bar: fleeing the state to slow the bill. It’s muscled class and labor back into our culture and media. It’s forged a new wave of activists, and it’s moved working people all over the place.
Last week, it included workers at Palermo’s Pizza in Milwaukee, who went on strike to win union recognition. Workers told me that last year’s occupation in Madison helped inspire them to defy their boss and strike, even in the face of management wielding immigration audits as a weapon. The Palermo’s workers aren’t affiliated with an international union; they’re working closely with Voces De La Frontera, an immigrant rights group whose connection to unions was deepened when they occupied the capitol together last year. That occupation, Voces De La Frontera’s Executive Director Christine Neumann-Ortiz told me yesterday, created “a lot of room for creative and broader partnerships, and just a broadening of the labor movement.”
On Monday, when I asked one of the Palermo’s workers about how his struggle related to the one that had occupied the capital, he told me matter-of-factly in Spanish: “It’s the same.” He wasn’t offering charity or quid pro quo. He was showing solidarity, that sense that of shared purpose and shared stakes that last year kept farmers and firefighters occupying their capitol together.
Wisconsin foreshadowed other labor uprisings that followed. Like the Wisconsinites, more workers defied expectations, or defied the law. Port truck drivers classified as “independent contractors,” not employees, went on strike despite the law and massed at their state capitol to change it. Longshore workers ignored injunctions and occupied train tracks rather than let them be used to do their work without their union. Tomato growers forced Trader Joe’s to negotiate with them – not through any legal authority, but by organizing consumers and wielding the power to boycott.
With legal collective bargaining rights set to stay hamstrung in Wisconsin, Wisconsin Education Association Council President Mary Bell told me yesterday, “collective action, collective voice doesn’t change. In fact, without the protections of the collective bargaining, collective voice is sometimes the only voice you have in the workplace.”
Soon after Scott Walker declared victory, South Central Federation of Labor President Kevin Gundlach told me that the tasks now facing Wisconsin’s labor movement would have been necessary even if Walker lost: “We would have to rebuild our unions. We would have to do a lot of community outreach and coalition building…We have to embolden our workers” and take on “workplace actions that could lead to other forms of power.”
The U.S. labor movement is at a Wisconsin moment in the best and worst sense: it keeps showing strength and weakness in unexpected places. Wisconsin shows that labor can still be a militant, growing, mass social movement – and that it has to be one in order to survive in the face of existential threat.

Josh Eidelson is a freelance journalist and a contributor at The American Prospect and In These Times. After receiving his MA in Political Science, he worked as a union organizer for five years.MORE JOSH EIDELSON.
LOLGOP ‏@LOLGOPWeird. People won't pay for unions that aren't allowed to bargain on their behalf. Doesn't sound like an evil plan at all.

Don't Let Congress and Broadcasters Keep You in the Dark

To contact us Click HERE

Don't Let Congress and Broadcasters Keep You in the Dark

A House Appropriations Subcommittee just voted on a measure to decrease transparency for political ads aired on local television stations.If signed into law, this bill would deny the public better access to information about the wealthy corporations and individuals that are inundating our airwaves with misleading political ads in 2012.The FCC decision was a milestone in the fight for better democracy. Yet as with any hard-won reform in the age of big-money politics, this change in being attacked by unscrupulous members of Congress, who put the interests of corporate lobbyists before those of everyday Americans.Please sign this letter to your members of Congress and demand that they serve the public first.In this post-Citizens United era, we can't let broadcasters hide their political profits.

Real Estate Investors need to use an Action Plan.

To contact us Click HERE
There is a saying among Real Estate Investor's - "You Make Your Money when You Purchase the Property not When you Sell It."

There are so many things that can go wrong so it is important to make sure you buy the property right.

Smart Real Estate Investors need to develop an Action Plan before they are going to purchase an investment property. This plan should include the following:

• Identify a possible property for investment.
  • Make sure your SELLER is MOTIVATED to do the deal.
• Perform a market analysis.
  • What are going to be your carrying costs for the next 90 Days. Principal, Interest, Insurance, Taxes, Utilities, HOA fees....
  • After Repair Value ARV - What is the property worth after repairs. Look at the COMPS! Yes, the comparables.
  • Calculate your repair costs.
  • Calculate your Fair Market Rent FMR. See if the property is going to cash flow.
    • See previous posting and video about calculating Fair Market Rent FMR
• Secure Your funding for:
  • Purchasing the Asset.
  • Carrying Costs.
  • Repairs.
• Note: Don't forget to pay yourself for all this work you are doing!
• Make an OFFER based on the Maximum Allowable Offer MAO Rule, using ARV, Carrying and Repair Costs.
  • See previous MAO post at Using the MAO rule for determining your Investment Property Offer Price.
• What are you going to do with the asset? Develop an EXIT Strategy:
  • Flip the property for a profit or
  • Hold the property for Cash Flow.

This is the basic action plan which needs to be very fluid. Things change and you need to adapt.

Turnkey Property!

One of the more successful Action Plans we have used is to bundle a Section 8 or Plan Ocho tenant within the property FOR SALE. The tenant is part of the BUYER's Turnkey Package.

TURNKEY means the BUYER simply needs to turn the key to the front door and start making MONEY.

All the hard work has been done for the BUYER:

• Buying a Property that will Cash Flow.
• Rehabbing the property and brought up to Code.
• All utilities are functioning.
• Finding a reliable tenant.
  • We use Section 8 as a great resource for tenants because it is a very popular program for housing.
  • Section 8 Web Sites for listing Your Investment Property.
• Asset Protection strategy is already in place.
• Selling the Investment Property with minimal Closing Costs.
• Optional: Have it already furnished.

Investors should provide a turnkey solution for all their properties they plan to sell in the near future.

BUYERS like the idea of purchasing a property that comes bundled with a tenant.

Action Plans allow for Immediate Cash Flow and no Headaches!

Written by Bob Burns.

####

Money in The Bank Baby! Real Estate Investor Telephone #: 305-300-6242 email: sec8@planocho.com

Our Internet Footprint:

Section 8 Waiting List Openings in other Regions. Uh?

To contact us Click HERE

Should we cover Section 8 waiting list openings Nationwide?

We have been wrestling with this question for a while now! REIC is pretty connected to Section 8 Wait List openings in the Southeastern region, since a majority of our clients / readers are from South Florida. Should we care about other regions of the US concerning Section 8 Wait List Openings? YES! We should cover the whole US, Section 8 office by Section 8 office.

Here is our Justification!

Why is this important to our investors, blog readers and tenants? Miami Florida is the gateway to Latin America and the Caribbean. As a result, we have every nationality from these regions calling Miami, Florida their home. This does not mean they don't have relatives living in other parts of the United States.

Look at my background! I was born in Germantown, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania but I am calling Miami, Florida my current home. The rest of my family lives in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, California, etc.

A Section 8 or Plan 8 Wait List opening in New Jersey may not be important to the folks living in Miami but maybe their relatives in New Jersey could act on this information. Word of Mouth, Baby!

Here are several other reasons we feel we should cover all the Section 8 or Plan 8 Wait list Openings:

• Section 8 Vouchers are Portable.
  • See our posting about Section 8 Portability.
• People don't like South Florida and want to move to another state or region.
• Family Issues like death, health, divorce, empty nest, etc.
• Better Jobs and Salaries.
• Economic Hardship.
• The Weather in South Florida! Hurricanes, Heat, Humidity…
• Competition for the available Section 8 Vouchers and Wait List Openings.

We are sure you can add several other reasons why you want to move away or to South Florida.

So in the future we will be announcing Section 8 Waiting List Openings throughout the United States.

If you hear about any Section 8 Waiting List Openings please contact us at our email address below. We could use your help!

Oh by the way, below is a Section 8 Wait list Opening:

• Arizona
  • Section 8 Wait List of Cochise County, Arizona is currently Open

So starting today, we will TRY to cover all the Section 8 Wait List openings Nationwide.

Related Links, Blog Postings, Presentations or Articles:

• Check out our new blog:
  • Section 8 Miami: http://www.section8mia.com
• Section 8 Power Point Slide Show on Slideshare.net
• A REIC blog posting with a Section 8 Podcast

Written by Bob Burns.

####

Going Nationwide Baby! Real Estate Investor Telephone #: 305-300-6242 email: sec8@planocho.com

Our Internet Footprint:

Section 8 Wait List Opening in Paterson, New Jersey.

To contact us Click HERE

As promised from our previous blog, we are covering Waiting List Opening Nationwide.

We just found out that Paterson Housing Authority in New Jersey is taking New Section 8 Applications until April 6th. Sorry for the late notice but there is still time.

Only 300 applications will be Processed!

It started April 2nd and will close April 6th, 2012 and will remain closed until further notice. The number of qualified applications added to the waiting list will be 300 giving local preference to applicants living and working in the City of Paterson, New Jersey.

Anyone Interested in Applying?

Anyone interested in applying for the Section 8 or Plan 8 or Plan Ocho Voucher Program should complete and send the attached form (see below) to: Section 8 DCD Housing Choice Voucher Program Paterson Housing Authority P.O. Box 1949 Paterson, New Jersey 07509.

Only one application per White, 4 1/8 X 9 1/2" envelope for the Section 8 or Plan 8 Voucher program MUST be postmarked prior to midnight on April 6th, 2012.

If you need further assistance in completing the pre-application process because of a disability, please contact Donna Nelson-Ivy, Director of Health and Human Services, City of Paterson, at (973) 321-1242 during the period that the Authority will accept pre-applications.

Below is the form you must complete and mailed:

---

APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AT ANY OF THE PATERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY OFFICES.
Copies of this ad and application may be obtained free of charge at the following locations: Paterson Public Library-Broadway Paterson Public Library-Main Street in South Paterson. Hispanic Multi-purpose Center 933 E 23rd Street, Paterson. Riverside Veterans Hall 165 5th Avenue, Paterson. Paterson Success Center 79 Ellison Street, Paterson
Paterson Housing Authority Housing Choice Voucher Program Preliminary Application Applicant Information
Name:________________________________________
Address:_________________________________________________
City, State and Zip Code:__________________________________
Phone: ___________________________
Household members:
1.__________________________ SSN#______________________
2.__________________________ SSN#_______________________
3.__________________________ SSN#_______________________
4.__________________________ SSN#_______________________
5.__________________________ SSN#_______________________
6.__________________________ SSN#_______________________
Annual Income for entire household: $_________________________
White ___ Black/African ___ American___American
Indian/Alaskan Native___ Asian___
Native Hawaiian/or other Pacific Islander___
Hispanic or Latino___Not Hispanic or Latino___
Please be advised that you may include additional information on a blank sheet of paper should you need space for additional family members.
Please include names and the respective social security number for each household member.
Signature/Head of Household_______________________________
Date:_____/___/2012
All Applications must be postmarked prior to midnight of April 6th, 2012. All applications not selected during the Lottery Process will be
discarded. The PHA will not accept applications at any of our offices, they must be mailed to: PO Box 1949, Paterson NJ 07509.

Written by Bob Burns.

####

300 Applications, Yeah Baby! Real Estate Investor Telephone #: 305-300-6242 email: sec8@planocho.com

Our Internet Footprint:

Section 8 Waiting List Openings in North East Missouri

To contact us Click HERE

The North East Community Action Corp. (NECAC.org) which manages HUD's Section 8 or Plan 8 program for 12 Northeast, Missouri counties announced they will begin accepting Section 8 waiting list applications this month.

Here is a link to: Missouri County Map which provides a list of counties and management office zones for HUD's Section 8 Voucher Program. NECAC headquarter's is in Bowling Green, MO and number 13 on the map's office listings.

NECAC announced it will begin taking applications again this month for the federally funded vouchers. Applicants for the program, must sign up in NECAC county service centers. No start or finish dates have been specified.

For information about the Section 8 rental assistance program, please contact (573) 324-2055 or the Service Center in your county.

Below is the list of the counties NECAC manages for HUD's Section 8 Voucher Program:

• Lewis, Lincoln, Macon
• Marion, Monroe, Montgomery
• Pike, Ralls, Randolph
• Shelby, St. Charles, Warren

Related Links, Blog Postings, Presentations or Articles:

• Section 8 Waiting List Openings Coverage Posting.
• Section 8 Miami Coverage Blog.
• Hialeah Housing Authority HHA video

Written by Bob Burns.

####

Show Me Baby! Real Estate Investor Telephone #: 305-300-6242 email: sec8@planocho.com

Our Internet Footprint: